Crucifixion of Jesus

Muslims do not believe in Crucifixion.  I am sure you’ll agree that there are only two alternative theories:

First Theory: Romans crucified Jesus and details of what exactly happened at the Crucifixion—coming from Pilate, his guards/soldiers, and Mary Magdalene—are true. The twelve disciples of Jesus, who were neither present at the crucifixion nor at the resurrection, believed what they were told and that story ended up in the four synoptic gospels. Let’s call it the Crucifixion Theory.

Second Theory:
Jesus was saved by Pilate, their mutual friend Joseph of Arimathea, Nicodemus, Herod and Mary Magdalene. The crucifixion was staged and Jesus never died at the cross. Let’s call it the Deliverance Theory.

Now, ask yourself the following questions as to which of the two theories provides the most consistent answers:

1. Jesus had said, “For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Jonah never died in the belly of the whale, so how could Jesus? The Crucifixion Theory has no satisfactory answer. The Deliverance Theory does, as it can be assumed that Jesus went “underground” i.e., he was hiding in an underground shelter in Joseph’s garden. [Jesus was never in the tomb for three days and three nights anyway!]

2. Why Jesus’ legs were not broken, as was the practice during Roman crucifixions? Legs were broken to hasten death, but Christians argue that was not done to Jesus because he had already died. But Roman soldiers could have broken his legs, anyway. How did they know that Jesus was really dead? The Deliverance Theory suggests that Pilate never wanted to kill Jesus and since the Crucifixion was staged, there was no need to break Jesus’ legs.

3. Why would Pilate and Herod, who were enemies, become friends after Jesus was sent to Herod? The Crucifixion Theory has no good explanation. The Deliverance Theory has a plausible explanation: According to Luke 23:12, after Herod too found Jesus innocent, he and Pilate became friends. If Herod and his soldiers had indeed mocked Jesus, if Pilate had thought all along that Jesus was innocent, why would they become friends? It doesn’t make any sense. The only way to explain is that the two men realized what was going on and came up with an elaborate scheme to fool extremist Pharisees. They probably weren’t laughing at Jesus but at their own plot to save Jesus’ life.

4. Why would Jesus recite, “”Eloi, Eloi,lama sabachthani?”–which means, “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” The Crucifixion Theory has no good explanation. As per the Deliverance Theory, that’s a major clue that Jesus didn’t die on the cross! “”Eloi, Eloi,lama sabachthani?” comes from Psalm 22.

There are great many parallels between Psalm 22 and what allegedly transpired during the crucifixion.

Here are some examples:

Psalm 22: “My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”

This is the same as what Jesus had shouted during the alleged crucifixion.

Psalm 22:”All who see me mock me; they hurl insults, shaking their heads: ‘He trusts in the LORD; let the LORD rescue him. Let him deliver him, since he delights in him.”

Now compare this with Matthew:

“Those who passed by hurled insults at him, shaking their heads…In the same way the chief priests, the teachers of the law and the elders mocked him…’He trusts in God. Let God rescue him now if he wants him.”

Psalm 22: “Dogs have surrounded me; a band of evil men has encircled me, they have pierced my hands and my feet.”

This is the same as in the alleged crucifixion.

Psalm 22: “They divide my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.

Compare this with Matthew:

“When they had crucified him, they divided up his clothes by casting lots…Let’s not tear it,’ they said to one another. ‘Let’s decide by lot who will get it.”

Now, whoever wrote the Gospel of John must have been aware that this came directly from the Psalm and apologetically had to add, “This happened that the scripture might be fulfilled which said, ‘They divided my garments among them and cast lots for my clothing.'”

To fulfill other portions of the scripture, John has added other details: “Instead, one of the soldiers pierced Jesus’ side with a spear, bringing a sudden flow of blood and water. The man who saw it has given testimony, and his testimony is true. He knows that he tells the truth, and he testifies so that you also may believe. These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: ‘Not one of his bones will be broken,’ and, as another scripture says, ‘They will look on the one they have pierced.'”

Psalm 22 was written by David and not Jesus. But for the sake of argument, let’s assume that Psalm 22 was indeed a prophecy for Jesus. Psalm 22 has two parts. The first part ends at verse 22 which reads, “I will declare your name to my brothers; in the congregation I will praise you,” which is the promise that David is making that if God saves him from the “mouths of lions” and “horns of the wild oxen,” he will do all these things. The second part extols God, so that the prayer may he heard. And as we all know, God not only heard David’s prayer, he gave him far greater success than he could have imagined. If John was trying to get his readers to see that it was all a fulfillment of scripture, I think he missed the obvious parallel! Psalm 22 led to a divine rescue mission, and that must have been the case with Jesus as well. Because once Jesus invoked Psalm 22, which he might have done ‘before’ crucifixion, it was probably incumbent on God to rescue His own servant, as He had rescued David earlier. [See also Hebrews 5:7-8].

5. If Joseph of Arimathea was a mutual friend of both Jesus and Pilate, as reported in the Gospel of Peter, why didn’t he approach Pilate during the trial and defended Jesus? The Crucifixion Theory has no explanation. As per the Deliverance Theory, he and Pilate came up with a plan to save Jesus and after staging Crucifixion, Pilate simply handed over Jesus to him. Joseph took Jesus to his estate, moved him to an underground shelter that night, while putting a stone over the tomb to lead people to believe that Jesus had been interred. So it was a perfect plan to put Jesus in the care of a person who had been secretly trying to help him.

6. How Pilate appeased his wife, who didn’t want Jesus dead? The Crucifixion Theory has no satisfactory answer. The Deliverance Theory does.

7. Why would Mary Magdalene try to anoint Jesus two days after he had been allegedly interred into the tomb? The Crucifixion Theory has no good explanation. The Deliverance Theory does. According to Matthew, “59 Joseph took the body, wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, 60 and placed it in his own new tomb that he had cut out of the rock. He rolled a big stone in front of the entrance to the tomb and went away. 61Mary Magdalene and the other Mary were sitting there opposite the tomb.” So Joseph already gave Jesus a proper “burial” in front of Mary Magdalene and the other Mary. It’s ridiculous to think that Mary Magdalene came back after two days, wanting to move the tombstone by herself in order to anoint a rotting body. A more reasonable explanation would be that Jesus never died and was living in Joseph’s garden, and Mary came back after the Sabbath to meet him and to anoint him the way she used to do, as reported in the Bible.

8. How did Jesus get out when Jews had already posted a seal on the stone and Pilate had posted his guards? If Jesus was resurrected after the second day, it would have been impossible for him to push the stone from inside. The Crucifixion Theory has no explanation. According to the Deliverance Theory, Jesus was never there in the first place. He was planning to reveal himself AFTER THREE DAYS AND THREE NIGHTS [sign of Jonah]. Even Jews had quoted him saying “‘AFTER three days I will rise again.” But he made an appearance before Mary Magdalene only after two nights and one and a half days. Thus, the Crucifixion theory has a flaw. The Deliverance Theory suggests that he meant other disciples, not Mary Magdalene who knew all along that Jesus was alive.

9. Why Mary Magdalene couldn’t recognize Jesus in the garden or thought that he was a gardener? The Crucifixion Theory has no good explanation. As per the Deliverance Theory, Jesus was in disguise, pretending to be Joseph’s gardener. He was still afraid of being recognized by Pharisees. If he had been resurrected, he would not have been in disguise.

10. Why did Mary Magdalene say, “supposing that he is the gardener…`Sir, if thou didst carry him away, tell me where thou didst lay him, and I will take him away?” Where could she take a corpse all by herself? The Crucifixion Theory has no explanation. The Deliverance Theory suggests that she was asking where Jesus had been hiding and how she could take him away, which means that she knew that he was alive.

11. The night before, Jesus even prayed for help! [He never wanted to die for anybody’s sins!]

Mark 14:36 [also Matthew 26:39]

35Going a little farther, he fell to the ground and prayed that if possible the hour might pass from him. 36″Abba, Father,” he said, “everything is possible for you. Take this cup from me. Yet not what I will, but what you will.”

Luke 22:42-44

42″Father, if you are willing, take this cup from me; yet not my will, but yours be done.” 43An angel from heaven appeared to him and strengthened him. 44And being in anguish, he prayed more earnestly, and his sweat was like drops of blood falling to the ground.

And his prayers were heard! Here is the final piece of evidence:

Hebrews 5:7

7During the days of Jesus’ life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission.

How can anyone in his right mind ignore this? Only a diehard Christian would be in denial.

No matter how you read it, the Deliverance Theory is so much more consistent than the Crucifixion Theory and has to be accepted as historically more reliable.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Crucifixion of Jesus

  1. aisha August 13, 2012 at 7:25 pm Reply

    i find it quite funny how almost the entire bible contradicts itself over and over but noone can see it. also if he supposedly died how is it that he’s gonna come back and fight the false messiah. whos gonna raise him back up if hes god imean god shouldnt be able to die and if he was “god reincarnated” who in the world was he praying to i mean really!! you know what all of the answers to this are in the Quran

    • sincereadvisor August 14, 2012 at 12:07 am Reply

      Good points, Aisha.

    • Melanie Dodge February 23, 2014 at 3:33 am Reply

      The Hebrew and Greek testaments don’t say that Jesus is God, but they do say that Jesus is God’s representative, that God gave him His authority on earth and caused him to be humble and suffer and die before raising him to life and glorification.

      Jesus NEVER sinned, making it possible for him to be a PERFECT vessel for God’s spirit. Being perfect, he was FULLY indwelled by that spirit. The scriptures also state that everyone else who has or will ever live has sinned at least once in their life, making them imperfect vessels and therefore ineligible for serving as the Messiah. However, a person can sin and then repent and be forgiven and thereby be made sinless – not perfect, but clean.

      All true seekers of God are given the spirit of God to guide them and followers of God are able to draw closer to Him through the pursuit of holiness. Jesus drew closer than any other person who has ever or will ever live. Those who become sinless though repentance and righteousness will be directly under him in reward, but those who die in sin will be purified by the altar-fire of heaven, suffering perpetual destruction until the full price for their sin has been paid.

      The scriptures say that Jesus was (and is) the Messiah, a man with free will who was sent directly by God as a gift to mankind because mankind didn’t live up to its promise to produce an eligible person who could stand up to God’s tests and not sin. It was always God’s plan to have His spirit indwell people and to have man who had experienced temptation and suffering, even unto death, and yet remained perfect to lead them.

      Most Christians believe that Jesus paid for their sins through his suffering and death and that they will be purified on being recognized and called out as a follower of Jesus at the Great Judgement, thus allowing them to be saved from the altar-fire through avoidance altogether. Other Christians debate this, stating that everyone will experience the purification by altar-fire if they die in sin, but that the followers of the Messiah will not suffer despite the fire, owing to the point that Jesus will be with them and has been given the power to save them in that manner. My own belief leans toward the latter theory, which is rooted in Daniel 3:24-30.

      • sincereadvisor March 5, 2014 at 4:14 am

        Muslims also believe that all prophets are “innocent.” But no human being was/is “perfect;” no, not even Jesus. For example, Jesus didn’t know that it wasn’t the season for figs and rather than admit his mistake, he cursed the tree, which withered the next day. Poor tree! Then, how does one justify Jesus how Jesus initially treated the Gentile woman who sought his help in removing the demons from her daughter?

        So, all prophets made mistakes, and that’s because they were human. Jesus himself stated, “Why do you call me good? No one is good but God alone.” So God alone is perfect.

  2. Peter A. February 28, 2013 at 12:17 am Reply

    1. For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.” Jonah never died in the belly of the whale, so how could Jesus?

    – How does this conjecture come together? The verse repeats three days and three nights, – that being the direct comparison in length of time. And “heart of the earth” as the differentiation between the two.

    Example Context: 2 Basketball Fans

    Mike stood up the whole game and painted his whole body Knicks colors, so I will stand up the whole game and paint my hair Knicks colors.

    Your breakdown would lead: Mike is required to have his hair painted. Analytically, why do you make this assumption.

    One thing at a time now…

  3. Melanie Dodge February 20, 2014 at 10:32 pm Reply

    You stated that Muslims do not believe in the crucifixion of Jesus and, for the most part, that is true. But there are some Quranites who do believe, though they risk being rejected as Muslims by the majority group. There is well-written article which specifically addresses the various traditions surrounding the topic of the crucifixion, though I do not endorse the whole of the site: http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/crucifixion.htm.

    • sincereadvisor March 5, 2014 at 3:59 am Reply

      It’s not Quranites but Ahmediya sect which believes that Jesus “died” a natural death, but even they cannot deny that Quran explictly states the following,: “And because of their saying (in boast), ‘We killed Messiah ‘Isa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary), the Messenger of Allâh,’ – but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but the resemblance of ‘Isa (Jesus) was put over another man (and they killed that man), and those who differ therein are full of doubts. They have no (certain) knowledge, they follow nothing but conjecture. For surely; they killed him not [i.e. ‘Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary)].” How can it be more clear? In your source from Answering Islam web site, the translators Maulana Muhamamd Alia and Sher Ali belonged to Ahmediya sect. Shakir didn’t know Arabic and plagiarized Ahmediya translations, changing a word here and there. And T. B. Irving must have been influenced by the same sources.

      • Melanie Dodge March 24, 2014 at 3:59 am

        I was not speaking of a “natural death” nor of the Ahmediya sect, but was in fact referring to some Quranites who believe that Jesus was crucified, just as the Jews and Christians believe. I admit the website used scripture injected with added interpretations (conjectures), but every Muslim knows that such additions are exactly that: additions. The actual wording of the Quran, which does not include a guess as to how it happened, reflects the exact same message of the Middle Testament, to which some Quranists subscribe as the actual commentary on the topic. Thus, they interpret the text to mean that the Jews were used like pawns by God to fulfill His divine purpose (which is the majority point of the article I used). Furthermore, if Isa did not fulfill the prophecies required of the Messiah, he would not be the Messiah. But, because he did, he is recognized to be the Messiah. Those prophecies, which were written both before and after the time of Musa, included being crucified, being raised up, being rewarded above all others, and coming a second time to lead God’s kingdom into the promised life. Those who reject the Quran by rejecting what the Quran has validated to be scripture and claimed would be preserved by God as scripture try to justify subtracting the Book from scripture and adding their own conjectures about such events to the Quran itself. But that is clearly a no-no, no matter what testament you subscribe to.

  4. Melanie Dodge March 24, 2014 at 4:08 am Reply

    (BTW, if you are interested, there is a word-for-word translation of the Quran online which avoids injected interpretations ad which most Quranites prefer over those so infused with added interpretations and commentary. You can see it here. It’s great for improving one’s ancient Arabic as well. http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp?chapter=4&verse=157)

  5. Herman47 March 4, 2015 at 3:28 am Reply

    The Quranic verses 3:54 & 8:30 both end with a word that can be translated as either “deceivers” or “planners.” That is to say, in both 3:54 & 8:30 we read “and Allah is the best of [“deceivers” or “planners”]. Which of the 2 words is the more reasonable translation?
    This is where the crucifixion comes in.
    2.2 billion Christians alive today (and millions more throughout history) believe that Christ was crucified. Astonishingly, Muslims believe that all Christians have been deceived; Christ was not crucified! SURELY, ALLAH IS THE BEST OF THE DECEIVERS.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: