Ground Zero Mosque Controversy


The opposition to the proposed Cordoba Islamic Center, near Ground Zero,  is based on the false premise that Islam or some radical interpretation of it caused 9-11.  [Please see my article, “9-11 and The Biggest Lie in America,” on this web page].   Numerous myths have been created to oppose this Islamic Center, some of which are so ludicrous that they need not be answered.  We will expose some of these myths and provide explanations, so reasonable non-Muslims could understand and have a better understanding of the position of those who are supporting this project:

MYTH 1:  The Ground Zero Mosque is opposed by the families of the victims of 9-11.

Response:  Who has surveyed 9-11 families and why the feelings of the families of two-dozen or so Muslims who were killed in 9-11 any less important?  Even if the families oppose the mosque because of wrong reasons, they need to be educated that Islam is not the enemy and that the motivations of 9-11 hijackers were not religious. 

MYTH 2:  There are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia, and therefore this mosque must be opposed.

Response:  Saudis do not even allow mosques of other Muslims sects, so why would they allow Christian Churches or Synagogues? Having said that, the entire non-Muslim population of Saudi Arabia consists of expatriates.  It is transient and not likely to stay in Saudi Arabia forever.  So, if there are no non-Muslims who are permanent residents of Saudi Arabia, who would eventually own and run these churches and synagogues?  Should Saudi imports Christian preachers and rabbis just to prove that they are tolerant? 

There are thousands of Christian churches in the Muslim world, even if there aren’t any in Saudi Arabia.  In Karachi, Pakistan, St. Patrick’s Cathedral, built in 1845, is right in the city center.    A brand new Catholic church was recently constructed in Qatar.   Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia, Lebanon, Syria, Nigeria and several other Muslim countries have large Christian populations.

MYTH 3: It’s a sensitivity issue, not an issue of religious rights.

Response:  Why are people of other faiths being asked anyway if they would ‘allow’ the construction of a mosque?  If Christians are asked if they want a Hindu temple in their neighborhood, they too might say, no.  In this case sensitivity is bigotry, borne of false analogies and a myth that Muslims are collectively responsible for 9-11 and therefore must accept their status as second-class citizens of this country.

Myth 4: It’s a “Victory Mosque.”  Muslims are building it as a monument to their victory on 9-11, and that’s why they named it “Cordoba.”

Response:  Muslim population, which a tiny minority in the United States, has not “conquered” the United States, nor does it have any desire to do so.  The events of 9-11 were nothing but tragic and can hardly be described as a victory.  The proposed Islamic Center will be called Cordoba because Cordoba was a place where Muslims, Christians, and Jews could live together, hold intellectual debates, and promote arts and learning.

Not Again! Afghan Women Being Used to Shore Up Support for the War


Most of us remember the television clips of Afghan women being beaten by Taliban (shown ad nauseum on CNN prior to the invasion of Afghanistan). What goes around comes around. Once again, the US government is using the plight of Afghan women to shore up support for the war.  One of the leaked documents on Wikileaks contains a CIA Red Cell memo that says, “Afghan women could serve as ideal messengers in humanizing the ISAF role in combating the Taliban because of women’s ability to speak personally and credibly about their experiences under the Taliban, their aspirations for the future, and their fears of a Taliban victory. Outreach initiatives that create media opportunities for Afghan women to share their stories with French, German, and other European women could help to overcome pervasive skepticism among in Western Europe toward the ISAF mission.” (1)

That media opportunity was provided at the US Institute of Peace, covered by CSPAN today (August 2, 2010) and was described as, “a discussion on efforts to reconcile with elements of the Taliban and the impact those efforts could have on women in Afghanistan.”

In what seems like a coordinated effort in the media, the Time Magazine recently put on its cover the picture of an Afghan girl, whose nose and ears had been cut off by her abusive husband. Even though Time admitted that the incident happened ‘during’ the American occupation of Afghanistan, it went on to imply that similar fate awaits other Afghan women if Taliban are allowed to make a comeback.  Short on evidence, Time made its point with a joke: “For Afghanistan’s women, an early withdrawal of international forces could be disastrous. An Afghan refugee who grew up in Canada, Mozhdah Jamalzadah recently returned home to launch an Oprah-style talk show in which she has been able to subtly introduce questions of women’s rights without provoking the ire of religious conservatives. On a recent episode, a male guest told a joke about a foreign human rights team in Afghanistan. In the cities, the team noticed that women walked six paces behind their husbands. But in rural Helmand, where the Taliban is strongest, they saw a woman six steps ahead. The foreigners rushed to congratulate the husband on his enlightenment only to be told that he stuck his wife in front because they were walking through a minefield. As the audience roared with laughter, Jamalzadah reflected that it may take about 10 to 15 years before Afghan women can truly walk alongside men.”

This strategy to use Afghan women as a tool has become so shamefully blatant that even Feminist Peace Network condemned it on its web page with an article, “Time Magazine Once Again Trots Out The Tired and Inexcusable ‘We’re in Afghanistan (And Have to Stay) to Protect Women’ Mantra.” (2)

Although one must sympathize with the plight of Afghan women, and all abused women around the world for that matter, the government’s tactic to use them as a propaganda tool in order to generate continued support for the war and to stay in Afghanistan indefinitely is unconscionable.  It belittles the efforts of those who are genuinely working to raise women’s social status in Afghanistan and elsewhere.  Abuse of women is a serious global problem, not limited to Afghanistan.  It should not be allowed to become a political tool, as that would be most counterproductive and an insult to the intelligence of ordinary Americans.

Links:

(1) http://wikileaks.org

(2)http://www.feministpeacenetwork.org/

Florida Church Sponsoring Quran Burning to Commemorate 9-11


As if there aren’t enough controversies involving Islam and Muslims these days, a church in Florida, known as Dove World Outreach, has decided to commemorate the upcoming 9-11 anniversary by hosting “Burn the Quran Day.” Muslims are cautioned not to overreact by coming out on streets, burning the American flag in retaliation or engaging in other acts of violence, as that would only play into the hands of our enemies.  Muslims need to remember that burning Quran is not a desecration but an acceptable means in Islam to dispose it.  Even though the motives of the church are hateful and ignominious, if not misdirected, Muslim anger will serve no other purpose than to encourage the loony fringe in this country to carry out greater assaults against Islam and Muslims.  It should also be noted that this announcement by the church has been widely condemned in Christian and other discussion blogs,  even by some social Conservatives who are generally critical of Islam and Muslims.

Quran is God’s message to the entire world, not just to Muslims. If there are Christians who are hell-bent on burning it rather than reading it to appreciate its passages praising Jesus and Mary, they would be guilty of burning some of the sublime teachings that they share with Muslims and Jews. They can burn the paper that the message is written on but that message is now everywhere: on the Internet, on radio, and mostly in our hearts.

We Muslims must learn that defending faith is important, but ‘how’ we defend is even more important.  Ultimately our goal should always be to win hearts and minds, not ‘even the score’ with violent protests or rants of our own. For the past 1400 years or so, Muslims have endured taunts and far worse things from their enemies. When we remained steadfast and kept our dignity and high moral standards, Islam grew. When we stooped to their level, we lost. Christians have never turned the other cheek, but we must, not because we are weak but we must obey the Quran when it says a number of times, “Repel evil with good.”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers